|
Post by sabz on May 17, 2006 1:13:35 GMT 3
well if he can beat monfils, fingers crossed he can deal with blake too! GOOD LUCK ANDY!! ;D
|
|
|
Post by SAFINNO1 on May 23, 2006 20:57:58 GMT 3
Good and Bad news
Arvind Parmer lost to Wayne Arthurs 6-2 6-7 8-10
but
Alex Bogdanavic bt Silmane Souldi 6-3 6-3
|
|
|
Post by SAFINNO1 on May 25, 2006 13:06:51 GMT 3
Talentless
British duo lose Paris qualifiers Keothavong went out in straight sets British number one Anne Keothavong lost in the first round of qualifying for the French Open on Wednesday. The 22-year-old was beaten 6-4 6-2 by Lucie Hradecka of the Czech Republic, leaving Elena Baltacha as the only British woman still in the draw.
In the men's draw, Alex Bogdanovic is out, losing his second-round qualifier to Marcelo Charpentier 5-7 6-4 7-5.
Baltacha was trailing Wen-Hsin Hsu 7-6 (9-7) 2-6 0-3 in her first-round qualifier when play was suspended.
The first Briton to head home from Paris was Arvind Parmar, who lost to Australian veteran Wayne Arthurs on Tuesday.
|
|
|
Post by sabz on May 25, 2006 15:10:24 GMT 3
lol Ily! so on that note, found aritcle on eurosport Too soon for Murray Once again another grand slam comes around with the hopes of British tennis in the hands of so few. Both Tim Henman and Greg Rusedski are on the slide and for the new bright hope of British tennis, young Scot Andrew Murray, this year's French Open has come year too soon. Murray, who has only just turned 19, arrived on the tour with a bang last year with runs to the third round at both Queen's club and Wimbledon before going on to finish the season inside the top 100. Of all the British challengers in Paris this year, his credentials would appear to be the strongest considering his upbringing on the clay of Barcelona. Murray's experience outside the usual LTA system has given him a more rounded game than other British players of recent years, a huge advantage on the relatively slow clay to be found at Roland Garros. However, despite this advantage, the world number 45 has struggled since the tour moved onto clay winning only two matches in four tournaments. A real shock considering his appearance in the final of the juniors event at the French Open last year. There have been moments of enlightenment, such as his victory over French prodigy Gael Monfils at last week's Hamburg Masters, but victories of this nature have been extremely rare. For example, during his shocking first round exit in Monaco at the hands of the virtually unknown Jean-Rene Lisnard Murray seemed to be struggling to remember the tactics required to succeed on clay after nearly a year away from the surface. To win on the slowest of surfaces takes a special mindset with patience and an ability to structure the point rather than blasting winners being the order of the day. Andy seems to have forgotten this and while these are skills he will certainly regain, this year's French Open may have come a little too soon on his development curve. Doubtless Murray is well capable of causing a couple of shocks in Paris, but there are still concerns about his stamina and endurance if asked to play a sequence of best-of-five set matches. But with time on his side, the future still look bright for the slightly built teenager from Dunblane. HENMAN HEROICS? At the other end of his career path, Tim Henman surely knows that his best years are now behind him. However, the Oxford man has shown in the past that he can compete on clay with his all-court game, causing a stir as he progressed to the semi-finals in Paris in 2004, before falling to Guillermo Coria in four thrilling sets. But this year form has deserted the former world number four with his tumble down the world rankings now leaving him third in the British rankings after years at the top of the domestic game. While still able to beat some of the top players on his day, boasting wins over Marat Safin and Lleyton Hewitt earlier this season, those days are becoming few and far between as Henman rides into the twilight of his life on tour. RUSEDSKI BULLET Even at the venerable age of 32 the Canadian-born Greg Rusedski is still a dangerous proposition for all but the very best, back willing, with his prodigious serve still in his armoury. As he showed as recently as two weeks ago at the Masters Series in Rome, he can still beat even the most ardent of clay courters with a shock three set victory over Tommy Robredo, winner of his first Masters tournament in Hamburg on Sunday. But, with Rusedski very much in the same boat at Henman, he will struggle to get very far at Roland Garros as consistency continues to be his main enemy. For those looking to see British involvement go beyond the first week in France this year, prospects are looking rather bleak. But, in the shape of Andy Murray there is a real ray of hope for the future. Good luck to all the brits at RG
|
|
|
Post by SAFINNO1 on May 25, 2006 20:40:20 GMT 3
Okay here are moy honest opinions for the lads at RG.
I genuinely think they will all get crap draws and be out in the 1st round with Murray being the exception although i dont think this tournament will be anything special in his career. i feel with Tim he will get some1 like nalbandian as for Rusedski i think his own down fall will be his serve, if that's not working then he's finished and i feel it will be early.
I know it's not optimistic and i know themselve will not be too optimistic but it's just Brits aint no good on clay and come Grass they will be there or thereabouts
But Good Luck Lads at RG
|
|
|
Post by SAFINNO1 on May 26, 2006 20:33:37 GMT 3
Murray to face Monfils in Paris Murray opens his campaign against fellow teenager Monfils British hope Andy Murray will play Gael Monfils in a first-round battle of the teenagers at next week's French Open. Murray, 19, faces the French 25th seed for the second time in a month, having won on clay at the Hamburg Masters.
British number one Greg Rusedski takes on Chile's Paul Capdeville, while compatriot Tim Henman faces Denmark's Kenneth Carlsen.
Top seed Roger Federer plays Frenchman Arnaud Clement and 2005 champion Rafael Nadal meets Swede Robin Soderling.
Federer - who dramatically lost to 2005 champion Nadal in Rome earlier this month - holds the US Open, Australian Open and Wimbledon titles, but has never won the French Open.
The Swiss 24-year-old hopes to complete his Grand Slam set in Paris and would become the first man to hold all four titles at the same time since Australia's Rod Laver in 1969 if he wins.
Rusedski, who replaced Murray as Britain's leading player in May, could meet Federer in the quarter-finals if he gets through the early stages including a possible second-round match-up with Croatian Mario Ancic.
Murray faces a likely encounter with eighth-seeded American James Blake in the third round and may take on Spanish hotshot Nadal for a semi-final spot.
|
|
|
Post by Madou on May 28, 2006 17:05:44 GMT 3
Tim just won against Carlsen 6-3 6-4 4-6 6-4. That's a great beginning !!!
|
|
|
Post by SAFINNO1 on May 28, 2006 17:56:16 GMT 3
Decent win for Tim, nothing special but it's a start. Will next play Novak or Mitya
|
|
|
Post by sabz on May 28, 2006 23:39:01 GMT 3
Congratulations to Tim! I would LOVE to see Tim play Dima!! that would be GREAT!! ;D Here is the post match interview Q. Sunday play. Are you now heavily in favor of it?
TIM HENMAN: "Heavily" is a strong word. I think I'm in favor of it. I think for, you know, kick starting the tournament on another weekend, I can certainly, you know, see the benefits.
It slightly disrupts the rhythm of playing, then having a rest day, then playing the next day. But I think the benefits are there. So, yeah.
Q. Were you slightly surprised to find yourself pulled out of the hat to play today?
TIM HENMAN: Yes, I was. Only playing six men and six women, I wasn't quite sure who it would be. Yeah, I was slightly surprised. Having been here since Tuesday, I've had plenty of practice, I've been hitting the ball well. If anything, I think it's a good thing for me. There are times when you feel like you just want to get underway, then you're not playing till Tuesday, you sort of get a bit more frustrated, if anything.
It actually, you know, fit in my schedule well.
Q. You're in a nice position in that tomorrow you can almost sit back and watch the Tursunov match, hopefully a five‑setter. Quite an unusual situation, isn't it?
TIM HENMAN: Yeah, it doesn't happen that often. You know, now I have two days off. I'll do some work physically, but I wouldn't have thought I'll practice tomorrow. Then I have a good hit on Tuesday and get ready for the match on Wednesday. But yeah, it's always a nice scenario when you're done your work and you can watch the other two battling it out.
Q. Obviously pleased today?
TIM HENMAN: Yeah, I was. It was good. It wasn't certainly the best match I've played. Playing someone of his style, he's not an authentic clay court player. When he serves as well as he does, it's not always that easy to find your rhythm. You know, I felt like I could have finished it in three. I obviously had the breakpoint at 4‑All.
On the whole, just pleased to win, pleased with the way I'm playing, and most pleased with how I feel physically.
Q. The day started out quite chilly at 11:00. Around noon the sun broke through, really did get pretty nice. How quickly does the speed of the court change under those conditions, in your experience?
TIM HENMAN: It does affect it. I think it certainly helps when it's a bit warmer. At the end of the day, it's certainly not going to get particularly quick because the courts are always fantastic here. I think they're the best clay courts we play on. I think the ball is certainly pretty heavy. It helps. It probably moves it from being very slow to slow.
You know, it's one of the aspects I've probably dropped my string tension quite a lot with the way we've been practicing, because it has been so cold and heavy. Then today, you sort of feel like maybe you could have strung it a little bit tighter. It's always difficult to predict that.
Q. Your expectations for yourself, given you were a semifinalist here, do you come into this tournament with a different mindset given what you have achieved?
TIM HENMAN: Yeah, it's twofold. Obviously having had that success and having had my best performance, got through to a semi, that definitely gives one self‑confidence. But on the other side, with the struggles that I've had, I feel there are less expectations from within. I'm not taking anything for granted. I'm trying to take the best out of both situations because, you know, putting extra pressure, I've done that in the past, and that doesn't help anyone.
I know that I can play well on this. I'm feeling so fit and good about my game. I just know that it's going to pay off at some stage ‑ whether it's here, Queen's or Wimbledon, who knows. I'll keep doing the right things and the results will come.
Q. Have you ever played a Grand Slam where two guys seem to be far and away the favorites? People have trouble figuring out who the third favorite is.
TIM HENMAN: Probably say it's thoroughly deserved. What, did they win 11 tournaments each last year? Their positions in the game just speak for themselves, how well they've been playing, the nature of their matches. It doesn't necessarily surprise me because they've been that good.
You know, coming into a Slam, it doesn't guarantee them anything. I just heard that Roger got off to a pretty slow start today against someone that he's probably never seen before. You just can't take anything for granted.
We'll have to wait and see. I think it's a final that perhaps people are expecting, people are hoping. It's our job to try and make sure it doesn't happen.
Q. Question about coaching. Saw Roger go a year without a coach, win some majors. You've had different coaches. Do you think the coach/player relationship in this sport is different? Do you think it's overrated?
TIM HENMAN: I don't think it's overrated. I think the relationship is kind of unique in this sport. Also I think a big aspect is it's different for everybody individually. You have to find what works. Some people like someone there 24/7, week in, week out, practice weeks, tournament weeks. Other people, you know, don't want a coach at all. Others, like myself, are probably finding the balance in between.
That's where it can get into I guess some difficult circumstances. At the end of the day, we employ someone to try and, you know, improve our games. But, you know, at the end of the day, we're the boss. It's a difficult balance. Sometimes you might hear something you don't really like, and you think, I might put an end to this. It's a bizarre situation. I don't think that happens in many other sports. That's where it is a difficult balancing act because you want to have respect for them, obviously their knowledge and input to the game. But if you're traveling so much, you have to have a sort of relationship where you can get along. You're seeing a lot of one another at the tournaments and practice. It's not an easy balance.
Q. Do you think you can maximize your talent and potential without a coach in this game? Do you really need someone there?
TIM HENMAN: That's a good question.
Q. Do you need someone there to extract that talent from you?
TIM HENMAN: I guess ‑‑ from a coaching point of view, I'm sure they'd like to say not, that one wouldn't maximize their potential. But you look at the game, how it's evolved. I don't think a lot of the old guys had coaches before, and they still played some pretty good tennis.
It's a difficult one. Obviously some coaches are better than others.
Q. Does starting now, going right through to Wimbledon, six weeks, even for media types, it's a hectic time of the year. Do you take a deep breath, Here we go again?
TIM HENMAN: I love it, I do. I know where you're coming from. It is a busy time. You sort of feel like you want to be fresh going into this stretch.
But, no, it's a fantastic six weeks. You know, I've learnt to enjoy. Obviously, my results have improved here. Really enjoy Paris. Then as soon as I'm finished here, whenever that may be, I'm home. And that speaks for itself.
Q. The runner‑up last year at this tournament is currently on suspension for testing positive for a banned substance. Another player who has done quite well here is on suspension. You know these players. They're friends of yours during the tour in some sense, either you chat with them in the lounge or know them very well. Do players resist talking about players like Cañas or Puerta, whoever is on suspension, because you know them? What is the general attitude that players have about these things?
TIM HENMAN: No, I mean, it's obviously been a talking point with the Cañas case because it was a two‑year ban reduced to a 15‑month ban. I'm sure there's plenty of guys talking about it. Certainly from my point of view, there's lack of knowledge of actually what happened in his case. If it's reduced by CAS, I'm sure there's some pretty good reasons. I think at the end of the day ‑‑ I should probably speak for myself ‑‑ but we're a relatively selfish bunch, we're just worried about what we're doing. We have to get on with that really.
Q. Where would you say your level of keenness is at the moment? You look as though you're keen to do well.
TIM HENMAN: Surprisingly high.
Q. More than they have been? This time last year you were struggling with so many things. There does seem to be a great desire to do well and play well at the moment.
TIM HENMAN: Yeah, definitely. I would say sort of it was a good problem to have two years ago, but I was playing probably as well as I played and my results were as good as I'd had. But I was sort of fatiguing. I think that was a mental issue that perhaps, you know, the number of years were kind of catching up with me of playing so consistently. Yeah, 2005 was just bad news all around. In that period of time, I wasn't healthy, but I just wasn't, therefore, enjoying what I was doing. It's been sort of a long process to kind of come out the other end.
My results aren't where I want them to be. But I know with the work that I've done, and how much better I feel, it's going to happen. So, yeah, I mean, it's a lot of fun to be feeling this keen and enthusiastic and enjoying it as much as I am.
Q. Because you are now No. 3 in Britain, do you look at this period with excitement that you can actually come out of not the shadows, but slightly a bit further back than people expect you. You're meant to be the point man, aren't you, this time of year? Does that change your attitude to these six weeks?
TIM HENMAN: If I look at the previous 12 months, and certainly from the French this time last year through the rest of the year, I only won three or four matches. You know, I don't really feel like it could have been much worse. Now it's an opportunity to take advantage of that. I've been through the process of getting fit and healthy ‑ knock on wood, it stays that way.
Yeah, I'm looking forward to taking advantage of it. I sort of feel like I'm going to start moving in the right direction. As you say, I think there's less expectation from within. I think there is probably less expectation from the outside, as well. You know, I want to sort of take advantage of that.
Q. I read you're playing golf again.
TIM HENMAN: Yeah.
Q. Is that the ultimate proof that you're back?
TIM HENMAN: Yeah, I played last Friday. I actually kind of hurt my neck a few days previously. It was actually the best thing that could have happened. I got on the course, I was thinking, Not sure I should be playing, my neck's a bit stiff. The first eight holes, I was so concerned about my neck, and then I suddenly thought, Actually, I should be worried about my back. I hadn't given it any thought. I thought things were looking up.
Q. What did you shoot?
TIM HENMAN: Played all right actually. 75 (smiling).
Q. How long had you not played for before shooting a 75?
TIM HENMAN: I played in March in Indian Wells, then I played in August before that, so...
|
|
|
Post by Annie on May 29, 2006 9:43:42 GMT 3
awwwwww he is such a darling!!! Congrats Tim and good luck ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by SAFINNO1 on May 30, 2006 0:19:52 GMT 3
Not his worst loss but still dissapointing nonetheless
Rusedski makes first-round exit Rusedski saved four match points in the deciding tie-break British number one Greg Rusedski lost in four sets to Chile's Paul Capdeville in the French Open first round. Rusedski gave an error-strewn performance in the first two sets but fought back to claim the third.
Capdeville, who is ranked 84 places below Rusedski at 124 in the world, went 3-0 ahead in the fourth set.
Rusedski again clawed his way back to force a tie-break and then saved four match points, but was unable to avert a 6-3 6-1 4-6 7-6 (9/7) defeat.
The 32-year-old Briton has not been past the first round at Roland Garros since 2001.
And if Andy Murray beats Gael Monfils in their Centre Court encounter on Tuesday, Rusedski is almost certain to lose his status as British number one.
Capdeville, 23, will now play Croatia's Mario Ancic, who beat Australia's Nathan Healey.
|
|
|
Post by sabz on May 30, 2006 1:03:03 GMT 3
Shame about Greg today! but now he can focus on the green stuff Tomorrow the battle of the teenagers!! Murray vs Monfils - i hope andy knows that the parisian croud are not gonna be too kind to him!! GOOD LUCK ANDY!!! Tim gonna play Dima two great players - shame one of them has to go. such divided loyalties - dunno who i am gonna support
|
|
|
Post by Annie on May 30, 2006 11:47:08 GMT 3
I think Tim might be up for some Wimbledon revenge LOL
|
|
|
Post by SAFINNO1 on May 30, 2006 17:32:54 GMT 3
Injured Murray beaten by Monfils Murray reached the semi-finals of the junior event last year Andy Murray once again saw his hopes dashed by an injury problem as he made a first-round exit against Gael Monfils on his senior debut at the French Open. The 19-year-old took a two sets to one lead but he was already suffering with a lower back problem which severely hampered his serve and movement.
Monfils, also 19, won the final set in 23 minutes to complete a 6-4 6-7 (2-7) 1-6 6-2 6-1 win.
Murray suffered physical problems at Wimbledon and the US Open last year.
|
|
|
Post by iman on May 30, 2006 17:37:34 GMT 3
for an injured murray the scoreline suggests that he didnt do to badley??? did anyone watch the match to give their opinion? iman xx
|
|