|
Post by edible on Oct 20, 2006 18:27:55 GMT 3
Now that I think about it, remember when he served that ace on 15-15 to become 30-15? And then after he won the replay point, the umpire said 30-15 again? I was thinking, it should be match point for Safin. Nope that is nalby who won the replay and it was double fault marat and then passing shot out so BP and then 6-6, but i was so sure that this passing was in... No, Nalbandian won the challenge and they replayed the point. It was not a DF because Marat faulted his first serve and his second serve was in and he won that point. It should have been 40-15 but the umpire said 30-15 for some reason.
|
|
|
Post by carole on Oct 20, 2006 18:31:11 GMT 3
I was thinking the replay was on second serve so double fault.... I'm pretty sure it was on second serve really... And i don't see Marat making an error on the score at that moment... If it was 40-15 and umpire said 30-15, our guy would have let him hear what was exactly the score !
|
|
|
Post by yse on Oct 20, 2006 18:31:29 GMT 3
|
|
|
Post by edible on Oct 20, 2006 18:32:36 GMT 3
Are you thinking about the same point as me? I was talking about the ace and then the very first challenge call by Nalbandian. Nalbandian won it and Marat won the replay point.
I can't help but feel like Marat was cheated by the umpire. But all credit goes to Nalbandian, he took advantage of his challenges and Marat's nerves and he won it.
|
|
|
Post by carole on Oct 20, 2006 18:34:39 GMT 3
Are you thinking about the same point as me? I was talking about the ace and then the very first challenge call by Nalbandian. Nalbandian won it and Marat won the replay point. I can't help but feel like Marat was cheated by the umpire. But all credit goes to Nalbandian, he took advantage of his challenges and Marat's nerves and he won it. It seems to me that at 30-15 Marat did a second serve that nalby challenged and was right so it's double fault and then 30 all, then that passing shot which was in for me but out for that umpire and it's BP... Then break...
|
|
|
Post by lena on Oct 20, 2006 18:36:02 GMT 3
wonderfull yse ;D many thanks
|
|
|
Post by emma on Oct 20, 2006 18:36:16 GMT 3
|
|
|
Post by kuniochi on Oct 20, 2006 18:37:00 GMT 3
It was a great fight and a great tourney for Marat! ;D ;D ;D The lenesman stole the victory from Marat, but there is nothing we can do!
|
|
MaratRocks
Full Member
Yesssss !! 2007 will be just as good.. Yipeeee
Posts: 383
|
Post by MaratRocks on Oct 20, 2006 18:45:52 GMT 3
|
|
|
Post by carole on Oct 20, 2006 18:48:18 GMT 3
Thinking again at that 6-5 game, it really seems that the score was right because Marat lost a point at 15-O to bring Nalby at 15 all, then ace and 30-15, then double fault so 30 all, then passing shot called out ( even if i'm sure it was in, but we're not on the court so...) 30-40, then the last point for the break....
|
|
|
Post by emma on Oct 20, 2006 18:50:02 GMT 3
|
|
|
Post by carole on Oct 20, 2006 18:53:53 GMT 3
Okay now i have an awful doubt about that damn 6-5 game... It would be too awful if he has lost because of that stupid mistake....
|
|
MaratRocks
Full Member
Yesssss !! 2007 will be just as good.. Yipeeee
Posts: 383
|
Post by MaratRocks on Oct 20, 2006 18:56:29 GMT 3
Exactly
|
|
|
Post by kuniochi on Oct 20, 2006 18:59:22 GMT 3
I don't rememver a double fault in this game! I hope I'm wrong......
|
|
|
Post by carole on Oct 20, 2006 19:00:57 GMT 3
I don't rememver a double fault in this game! I hope I'm wrong...... For me it was one if Nalby has challenged the second serve... That was what i was believing... God, can someone just check... For sure the match is over but still, would like to be sure...
|
|